The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
DAL · Industrials · Wide moat
On the watchlist
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | SN | SSD | LRCX | DAL |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 92 | 93 (highest) | 93 (highest) | 90 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 100 (highest) | 90 | 86 | 95 |
| Pricing power | 80 (highest) | 77 | 78 | — |
| Returns on capital | 100 (highest) | 97 | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 79 | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) | 65 |
| 461% above value if growth stopped today | 95% above value if growth stopped today | 578% above value if growth stopped today | 33% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | |
| Market cap | $27.3B | $7.2B | $347.2B | $51.0B |
| Moat tier | Wide moat | Wide moat | Wide moat | Wide moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2025 |