The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
TDAY · Materials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The balanceSheet component abstained: Insufficient leverage/coverage inputs to score the balance sheet. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | SND | KVUE | METC | TDAY |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 37 (highest) | 37 (highest) | 37 (highest) | 37 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 75 (highest) | 40 | 50 | 35 |
| Pricing power | 0 | 94 (highest) | 10 | 65 |
| Returns on capital | 7 | 23 | 58 (highest) | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 55 (highest) | 30 | 24 | — |
| Capital allocation | 48 (highest) | 0 | 44 | 48 (highest) |
| 36% above value if growth stopped today | 77% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | 18% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | |
| Market cap | $197M | $35.8B | Not reported | $1.1B |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |