The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
EP · Materials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
EXE · Materials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | SNES | EP | PRM | EXE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 36 (highest) | 36 (highest) | 36 (highest) | 36 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 65 (highest) | 41 | 43 | 25 |
| Pricing power | 43 | — | 53 (highest) | — |
| Returns on capital | 0 | 4 | 0 | 9 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 28 | 55 | 28 | 65 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 44 | 44 | 56 (highest) | 44 |
| No price data | No price data | 339% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | |
| Market cap | $3.7M | $114M | $4.1B | Not reported |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |