The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

SNEX · Other · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The balanceSheet component abstained: Insufficient leverage/coverage inputs to score the balance sheet. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

ZSQR · Other · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

SIEB · Other · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

HNNA · Other · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

MeasureSNEXZSQRSIEBHNNA
Moat Score (0–100)5052 (highest)5150
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend71 (highest)702253
Pricing power7092 (highest)——
Returns on capital005693 (highest)
Balance-sheet safety—55100 (highest)37
Capital allocation60 (highest)442417
11% above value if growth stopped todayNo price data13% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today)3% above value if growth stopped today
Market cap$3.0B$23.2M$67.1M$80.9M
Moat tierShallow moatShallow moatShallow moatShallow moat
Filing dateFY2025FY2025FY2025FY2025