The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
GTLL · Technology · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | SNPS | SMCI | FATN | GTLL |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 64 (highest) | 64 (highest) | 64 (highest) | 64 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 95 (highest) | 95 (highest) | 47 | 63 |
| Pricing power | 100 (highest) | 19 | 100 (highest) | 70 |
| Returns on capital | 66 | 48 | 76 (highest) | — |
| Balance-sheet safety | 0 | 100 (highest) | 72 | 100 (highest) |
| Capital discipline | 60 (highest) | 60 (highest) | 26 | 24 |
| Price vs. high estimate | 200% above high estimate | 55% above high estimate | 13% above high estimate (largest discount to high estimate) | No price data |
| Market cap | $69.5B | $17.9B | $63.3M | Not reported |
| Moat tier | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2025 |