The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
SO · Utilities · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | SO | CTRI | RENX | OPTT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 33 | 34 (highest) | 33 | 33 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 91 (highest) | 57 | 70 | 63 |
| Pricing power | — | 24 (highest) | 9 | 0 |
| Returns on capital | 1 (highest) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 1 | 64 (highest) | 28 | 55 |
| Capital allocation | 39 | 24 | 60 (highest) | 44 |
| 146% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | No price data | No price data | |
| Market cap | $108.9B | $2.8B | $1.9M | $25.7M |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |