The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

SPOK · Communications · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

DIS · Communications · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

CTGG · Communications · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The businessTrend component abstained: Fewer than two aligned fiscal years of revenue and diluted EPS are available; the filing history does not contain a measurable trend. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

WMG · Communications · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The businessTrend component abstained: Fewer than two aligned fiscal years of revenue and diluted EPS are available; the filing history does not contain a measurable trend. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

MeasureSPOKDISCTGGWMG
Moat Score (0–100)5658 (highest)5755
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend4993 (highest)
Pricing power100 (highest)9980
Returns on capital4205557 (highest)
Balance-sheet safety100 (highest)782814
Capital allocation27414469 (highest)
24% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today)360% above value if growth stopped todayNo price dataNo price data
Market cap$218M$180.2B$17Not reported
Moat tierShallow moatShallow moatShallow moatShallow moat
Filing dateFY2025FY2025FY2025FY2025