The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

SPRS · Industrials · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

WFRD · Industrials · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

FLOC · Industrials · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The businessTrend component abstained: Only one aligned fiscal year of revenue and diluted EPS is available; a trend needs at least two observations. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

VRRM · Industrials · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

On the watchlist

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

MeasureSPRSWFRDFLOCVRRM
Moat Score (0–100)50 (highest)50 (highest)50 (highest)50 (highest)
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend207190 (highest)
Pricing power19 (highest)40
Returns on capital6737100 (highest)8
Balance-sheet safety100 (highest)100 (highest)6222
Capital allocation44403980 (highest)
74% above value if growth stopped today21% above value if growth stopped today179% above value if growth stopped today58% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today)
Market cap$22M$6.3B$1.8B$622M
Moat tierShallow moatShallow moatShallow moatShallow moat
Filing dateFY2025FY2025FY2025FY2025