The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
SPWH · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
HOST · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
OPLN · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | SPWH | BRWC | HOST | OPLN |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 42 (highest) | 42 (highest) | 42 (highest) | 42 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 5 | 30 | 70 (highest) | 55 |
| Pricing power | 56 | 100 (highest) | 66 | — |
| Returns on capital | 82 (highest) | 0 | 0 | 9 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 0 | 55 | 28 | 58 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 64 (highest) | 24 | 44 | 44 |
| No price data | No price data | No price data | 133% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $39.4M | $6.2M | $38M | $3.9B |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2026 | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2025 |