The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

SR · Utilities · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

XEL · Utilities · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The businessTrend component abstained: Fewer than two aligned fiscal years of revenue and diluted EPS are available; the filing history does not contain a measurable trend. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

HTO · Utilities · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

AEE · Utilities · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

MeasureSRXELHTOAEE
Moat Score (0–100)36 (highest)36 (highest)36 (highest)36 (highest)
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend5498 (highest)89
Pricing power80100 (highest)
Returns on capital03 (highest)02
Balance-sheet safety1012 (highest)
Capital allocation43414551 (highest)
76% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today)159% above value if growth stopped today144% above value if growth stopped today145% above value if growth stopped today
Market cap$4.9B$50.9B$2.3B$31.4B
Moat tierNo moatNo moatNo moatNo moat
Filing dateFY2025FY2025FY2025FY2025