The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
AVR · Healthcare · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | SRTS | AVR | CRMD | ESTA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 42 (highest) | 42 (highest) | 42 (highest) | 42 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 31 | 20 | 78 (highest) | 65 |
| Pricing power | 90 | 70 | 11 | 94 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 11 (highest) | — | 4 | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 55 | 55 | 73 (highest) | 28 |
| Capital allocation | 24 | 24 | 44 (highest) | 24 |
| 11% below value if growth stopped today | No price data | No price data | No price data | |
| Market cap | $45.6M | $264M | $591M | $1.8B |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |