The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
SSP · Communications · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
SBGI · Communications · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
NUVR · Communications · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | SSP | SBGI | SIDU | NUVR |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 15 | 17 (highest) | 17 (highest) | 17 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 49 (highest) | 15 | 13 | 47 |
| Pricing power | — | — | 0 | — |
| Returns on capital | 3 | 19 (highest) | 0 | 2 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 0 | 0 | 28 (highest) | 0 |
| Capital discipline | 10 | 36 | 44 (highest) | 17 |
| Price vs. high estimate | 89% below high estimate (largest discount to high estimate) | 10% below high estimate | No price data | 2427% above high estimate |
| Market cap | $285.2M | $974.6M | — | $92.0M |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |