The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
RELY · Technology · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
CCLD · Technology · Shallow moat
On the watchlist
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | SSTI | BL | RELY | CCLD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 47 (highest) | 47 (highest) | 47 (highest) | 47 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 60 | 80 (highest) | 80 (highest) | 36 |
| Pricing power | 85 | 100 (highest) | — | — |
| Returns on capital | 9 (highest) | 0 | 7 | 7 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 55 | 29 | 75 | 99 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 24 | 24 | 24 | 44 (highest) |
| No price data | 146% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | 42% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | |
| Market cap | $106M | $1.7B | $4.7B | $94.2M |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |