The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
LDSN · Technology · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The businessTrend component abstained: Fewer than two aligned fiscal years of revenue and diluted EPS are available; the filing history does not contain a measurable trend. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
RELY · Technology · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
CCLD · Technology · Shallow moat
On the watchlist
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | SSTI | LDSN | RELY | CCLD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 47 (highest) | 47 (highest) | 47 (highest) | 47 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 60 | — | 80 (highest) | 36 |
| Pricing power | 85 (highest) | 70 | — | — |
| Returns on capital | 9 | 18 (highest) | 7 | 7 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 55 | 55 | 75 | 99 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 24 | 44 (highest) | 24 | 44 (highest) |
| No price data | No price data | No price data | 43% below value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $71.6M | $450773 | $4.6B | $92.1M |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2024 | FY2025 | FY2025 |