The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
ROC · Technology · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | STGW | MRVL | ROC | YEXT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 53 | 54 (highest) | 54 (highest) | 53 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 55 | 75 (highest) | 50 | 67 |
| Pricing power | 58 | 78 | 94 | 100 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 83 (highest) | 0 | — | 12 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 28 | 56 | 28 | 65 (highest) |
| Capital discipline | 44 | 60 (highest) | 44 | 24 |
| Price vs. high estimate | 31% above high estimate | No price data | No price data | No price data |
| Market cap | $1.9B | $164.6B | $66.7M | $615M |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2026 |