The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

STI · Technology · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

DOCN · Technology · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

SES · Technology · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

ONEI · Technology · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

MeasureSTIDOCNSESONEI
Moat Score (0–100)50 (highest)50 (highest)50 (highest)50 (highest)
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend5080 (highest)7057
Pricing power7096 (highest)8870
Returns on capital6 (highest)0
Balance-sheet safety282355 (highest)28
Capital allocation51 (highest)443544
No price data5167% above value if growth stopped todayNo price dataNo price data
Market cap$49.3M$11.4B$184M$5.1M
Moat tierShallow moatShallow moatShallow moatShallow moat
Filing dateFY2025FY2025FY2025FY2025