The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

STI · Technology · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

KOAN · Technology · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

SES · Technology · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

ONEI · Technology · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

MeasureSTIKOANSESONEI
Moat Score (0–100)50 (highest)50 (highest)50 (highest)50 (highest)
Methodology versionmoat-index@2.0.0moat-index@2.0.0moat-index@2.0.0moat-index@2.0.0
Business trend505070 (highest)57
Pricing power707088 (highest)70
Returns on capital0
Balance-sheet safety2855 (highest)55 (highest)28
Capital discipline51 (highest)243544
Price vs. high estimateNo price dataNo price dataNo price dataNo price data
Market cap$49.0M$61273$212.8M$4.7M
Moat tierShallow moatShallow moatShallow moatShallow moat
Filings as ofFY2025FY2024FY2025FY2025