The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

STKS · Consumer Discretionary · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

DNUT · Consumer Discretionary · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

OMTK · Consumer Discretionary · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The businessTrend component abstained: Only one aligned fiscal year of revenue and diluted EPS is available; a trend needs at least two observations. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

CISO · Consumer Discretionary · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

MeasureSTKSDNUTOMTKCISO
Moat Score (0–100)2223 (highest)23 (highest)22
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend50 (highest)4050 (highest)
Pricing power38 (highest)8
Returns on capital14 (highest)000
Balance-sheet safety028 (highest)28 (highest)28 (highest)
Capital allocation24 (highest)24 (highest)24 (highest)24 (highest)
8% above value if growth stopped todayNo price dataNo price dataNo price data
Market cap$56.5M$540M$219481$11.7M
Moat tierNo moatNo moatNo moatNo moat
Filing dateFY2025FY2025FY2025FY2025