The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
STRA · Consumer Discretionary · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
GPI · Consumer Discretionary · Narrow moat
Wonderful & reasonably priced
MAR · Consumer Discretionary · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | STRA | GPI | FSS | MAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 68 (highest) | 68 (highest) | 68 (highest) | 68 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 81 | 93 (highest) | 83 | 78 |
| Pricing power | — | 26 | 43 (highest) | — |
| Returns on capital | 11 | 51 | 56 | 78 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 100 (highest) | 73 | 84 | 15 |
| Capital discipline | 80 | 100 (highest) | 76 | 100 (highest) |
| Price vs. high estimate | 93% above high estimate | 63% below high estimate (largest discount to high estimate) | 106% above high estimate | 270% above high estimate |
| Market cap | $1.7B | $3.6B | $7.0B | $97.6B |
| Moat tier | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |