The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
STRA · Consumer Discretionary · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
OSK · Consumer Discretionary · Narrow moat
Wonderful & reasonably priced
EUBG · Consumer Discretionary · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | STRA | WMT | OSK | EUBG |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 67 (highest) | 67 (highest) | 67 (highest) | 67 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 76 | 86 | 87 (highest) | 55 |
| Pricing power | — | 44 | 26 | 91 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 11 | 75 (highest) | 65 | — |
| Balance-sheet safety | 100 (highest) | 72 | 63 | 100 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 80 | 57 | 93 (highest) | 20 |
| 107% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | 20% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 159% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $1.9B | Not reported | $8.0B | $42.8M |
| Moat tier | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2025 |