The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

STRT · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

BH · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

TNL · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

AIRO · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

MeasureSTRTBHTNLAIRO
Moat Score (0–100)51 (highest)51 (highest)51 (highest)51 (highest)
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend88 (highest)396759
Pricing power1065100 (highest)94
Returns on capital22—45 (highest)0
Balance-sheet safety73 (highest)55155
Capital allocation60 (highest)444044
4% below value if growth stopped todayNo price data14% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today)No price data
Market cap$247MNot reported$4.1B$172M
Moat tierShallow moatShallow moatShallow moatShallow moat
Filing dateFY2026FY2025FY2025FY2025