The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

STUB · Communications · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

GOGO · Communications · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

SGA · Communications · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

MSGS · Communications · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

MeasureSTUBGOGOSGAMSGS
Moat Score (0–100)3133 (highest)3231
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend50552958 (highest)
Pricing power————
Returns on capital1252 (highest)86
Balance-sheet safety28055 (highest)15
Capital allocation37243644 (highest)
739% above value if growth stopped today72% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today)48% below value if growth stopped todayNo price data
Market cap$1.9B$287M$52.9MNot reported
Moat tierNo moatNo moatNo moatNo moat
Filing dateFY2025FY2025FY2025FY2026