The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

SURG · Communications · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

PUSA · Communications · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

VIVC · Communications · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

IHRT · Communications · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

MeasureSURGPUSAVIVCIHRT
Moat Score (0–100)2223 (highest)2222
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend20222544 (highest)
Pricing power017 (highest)
Returns on capital18 (highest)18 (highest)18 (highest)4
Balance-sheet safety28 (highest)28 (highest)28 (highest)0
Capital allocation44 (highest)242438
No price data4037% above value if growth stopped todayNo price dataNo price data
Market cap$5.1M$49.2M$712684Not reported
Moat tierNo moatNo moatNo moatNo moat
Filing dateFY2025FY2025FY2025FY2025