The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
UPYY · Technology · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
MITK · Technology · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | SVCO | UPYY | DDOG | MITK |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 49 (highest) | 49 (highest) | 49 (highest) | 49 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 56 | 20 | 75 (highest) | 73 |
| Pricing power | 100 (highest) | 86 | 100 (highest) | — |
| Returns on capital | 12 (highest) | — | 0 | 9 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 55 (highest) | 28 | 28 | 55 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 24 | 64 (highest) | 44 | 60 |
| No price data | No price data | No price data | 763% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $240M | $15.8M | Not reported | $770M |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2025 |