The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

SVV · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

BNED · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

GHC · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

MGM · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat

Shallow moat

On the watchlist

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

MeasureSVVBNEDGHCMGM
Moat Score (0–100)4445 (highest)4444
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend525767 (highest)55
Pricing power49 (highest)34——
Returns on capital62 (highest)0055
Balance-sheet safety58100 (highest)3128
Capital allocation13180 (highest)40
165% above value if growth stopped todayNo price data42% above value if growth stopped today42% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today)
Market cap$1.6B$446M$5.3B$7.4B
Moat tierShallow moatShallow moatShallow moatShallow moat
Filing dateFY2025FY2026FY2025FY2025