The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
BLIS · Technology · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The businessTrend component abstained: Fewer than two aligned fiscal years of revenue and diluted EPS are available; the filing history does not contain a measurable trend. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | SWAG | BLIS | RPAY | OMCL |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 43 (highest) | 43 (highest) | 43 (highest) | 43 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 60 (highest) | — | 58 | 32 |
| Pricing power | 49 | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) | 75 |
| Returns on capital | 6 (highest) | 0 | 4 | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 55 | 28 | 28 | 100 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 44 (highest) | 44 (highest) | 24 | 6 |
| No price data | No price data | 79532% above value if growth stopped today | 269% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | |
| Market cap | $36.6M | $3.3M | $325.1B | $1.8B |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |