The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
SXC · Industrials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | SXC | BW | TPCS | RYZ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 22 (highest) | 22 (highest) | 22 (highest) | 22 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 42 | 26 | 53 (highest) | 15 |
| Pricing power | — | 12 | 4 | 30 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 23 | 0 | 4 | 38 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 0 | 28 (highest) | 4 | 0 |
| Capital allocation | 22 | 44 (highest) | 44 (highest) | 24 |
| No price data | No price data | No price data | 2% below value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | Not reported | $1.3B | $45.7M | $1.6B |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2025 |