The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
EVFM · Healthcare · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | TALK | EVFM | ADUS | TECH |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 57 (highest) | 57 (highest) | 57 (highest) | 57 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 85 | 60 | 100 (highest) | 54 |
| Pricing power | 76 | 70 | 48 | 100 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 0 | — | 12 | 26 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 100 (highest) | 55 | 65 | 68 |
| Capital allocation | 24 | 44 | 60 (highest) | 36 |
| No price data | No price data | 184% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 360% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $869M | $1M | $2.1B | $11.1B |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |