The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
MGSD · Industrials · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
DTI · Industrials · Narrow moat
Wonderful & reasonably priced
The balanceSheet component abstained: Insufficient leverage/coverage inputs to score the balance sheet. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | TAYD | MGSD | RBC | DTI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 63 | 64 (highest) | 63 | 63 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 86 | 70 | 100 (highest) | 44 |
| Pricing power | 26 | 70 | 64 | 100 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 36 | — | 13 | 88 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 100 (highest) | 73 | 80 | — |
| Capital allocation | 68 (highest) | 42 | 60 | 20 |
| 144% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | 510% above value if growth stopped today | 43% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | |
| Market cap | $232M | $1.3M | $16.3B | $59.6M |
| Moat tier | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat |
| Filing date | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2025 |