The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
DASH · Technology · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
STWI · Technology · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | TBLA | EBAY | DASH | STWI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 57 | 58 (highest) | 58 (highest) | 57 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 77 | 38 | 80 (highest) | 50 |
| Pricing power | 49 | 99 | — | 100 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 0 | 65 (highest) | 6 | — |
| Balance-sheet safety | 100 (highest) | 46 | 100 (highest) | 55 |
| Capital allocation | 60 (highest) | 40 | 44 | 24 |
| No price data | 118% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | No price data | |
| Market cap | Not reported | $49.1B | $76.0B | Not reported |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |