The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
TDAY · Materials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The balanceSheet component abstained: Insufficient leverage/coverage inputs to score the balance sheet. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | TDAY | METC | SND | CPSH |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 37 (highest) | 37 (highest) | 37 (highest) | 37 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 35 | 50 | 75 (highest) | 50 |
| Pricing power | 65 (highest) | 10 | 0 | 0 |
| Returns on capital | 0 | 58 (highest) | 7 | 11 |
| Balance-sheet safety | — | 24 | 55 | 100 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 48 (highest) | 44 | 48 (highest) | 24 |
| 38% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | 25% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 425% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $1.2B | Not reported | $181M | $79.9M |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |