The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
FDXF · Industrials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | TDDWW | FTEK | FDXF | RRX |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 35 (highest) | 35 (highest) | 35 (highest) | 35 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 85 (highest) | 35 | 13 | 68 |
| Pricing power | 0 | 62 (highest) | — | 39 |
| Returns on capital | 7 | 0 | 88 (highest) | 9 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 58 (highest) | 55 | 19 | 5 |
| Capital allocation | 24 | 24 | 20 | 52 (highest) |
| No price data | No price data | 23% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 63% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | Not reported | $47.4M | $18.9B | $10.8B |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2025 |