The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
TEAM · Technology · Narrow moat
On the watchlist
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | TEAM | ESE | PANW | DSP |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 65 (highest) | 65 (highest) | 65 (highest) | 65 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 70 | 100 (highest) | 75 | 75 |
| Pricing power | 100 (highest) | 64 | 100 (highest) | 75 |
| Returns on capital | — | 13 | 7 | 21 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 55 | 70 | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 36 | 79 (highest) | 44 | 55 |
| No price data | 381% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 3374% above value if growth stopped today | 655% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $54.1B | $6.4B | $278.7B | $847M |
| Moat tier | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat |
| Filing date | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2025 |