The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
LPG · Industrials · Narrow moat
Wonderful & reasonably priced
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | TEL | PLPC | LPG | FTI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 65 (highest) | 65 (highest) | 65 (highest) | 64 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 53 | 63 | 90 | 95 (highest) |
| Pricing power | 57 (highest) | 56 | — | 6 |
| Returns on capital | 74 (highest) | 28 | 14 | 25 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 85 | 100 (highest) | 57 | 94 |
| Capital allocation | 54 | 80 | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) |
| 138% above value if growth stopped today | 283% above value if growth stopped today | 23% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 1100% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $61.9B | $1.8B | $2.4B | $27.8B |
| Moat tier | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat | Narrow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2025 |