The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

TFX · Healthcare · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

CYCN · Healthcare · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

ABUS · Healthcare · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

SIGY · Healthcare · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The businessTrend component abstained: Fewer than two aligned fiscal years of revenue and diluted EPS are available; the filing history does not contain a measurable trend. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

MeasureTFXCYCNABUSSIGY
Moat Score (0–100)33 (highest)33 (highest)33 (highest)33 (highest)
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend203353 (highest)
Pricing power89 (highest)80
Returns on capital9 (highest)000
Balance-sheet safety055 (highest)55 (highest)28
Capital allocation47 (highest)442424
15% above value if growth stopped todayNo price dataNo price dataNo price data
Market cap$5.8B$13.4M$843M$48161
Moat tierNo moatNo moatNo moatNo moat
Filing dateFY2025FY2025FY2025FY2024