The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
THMG · Materials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | THMG | KRO | UEC | GORO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 25 (highest) | 25 (highest) | 25 (highest) | 25 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 | moat-index@2.0.0 |
| Business trend | 10 | 32 | 50 (highest) | 50 (highest) |
| Pricing power | — | 9 | 25 (highest) | 16 |
| Returns on capital | 12 | 40 (highest) | 0 | 7 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 55 (highest) | 0 | 28 | 28 |
| Capital discipline | 24 | 45 (highest) | 24 | 24 |
| Price vs. high estimate | No price data | 36% below high estimate | No price data | No price data |
| Market cap | $74.6M | $748.6M | $4.3B | $532.2M |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |