The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
THMG · Materials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | THMG | UEC | YHGJ | QUAD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 23 (highest) | 23 (highest) | 23 (highest) | 23 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 0 | 40 (highest) | 30 | 15 |
| Pricing power | — | 26 | 14 | 34 (highest) |
| Returns on capital | 12 | 0 | 0 | 13 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 55 (highest) | 28 | 28 | 31 |
| Capital allocation | 24 | 24 | 44 (highest) | 20 |
| No price data | No price data | No price data | 30% below value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $69.9M | $3.9B | $7M | $472M |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2025 |