The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
RUSHA · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
TSSI · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
MCRI · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
| Measure | THRM | RUSHA | TSSI | MCRI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 55 (highest) | 55 (highest) | 55 (highest) | 55 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 59 | 68 | 85 | 87 (highest) |
| Pricing power | 41 (highest) | 31 | 10 | 7 |
| Returns on capital | 37 | 47 (highest) | — | 26 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 97 | 69 | 100 (highest) | 78 |
| Capital allocation | 40 | 60 | 24 | 76 (highest) |
| 118% above value if growth stopped today | 83% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 17483% above value if growth stopped today | 133% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $1.3B | $6.2B | $268M | $2.1B |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |