The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
W · Consumer Discretionary · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
HYOR · Consumer Discretionary · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | TISI | RLEA | W | HYOR |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 25 (highest) | 25 (highest) | 25 (highest) | 25 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 46 | 49 (highest) | 35 | 20 |
| Pricing power | 43 (highest) | 0 | 41 | — |
| Returns on capital | 0 | 12 (highest) | — | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 0 | 28 | 0 | 55 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 35 | 38 (highest) | 24 | 24 |
| No price data | No price data | No price data | No price data | |
| Market cap | $77M | Not reported | $10.8B | Not reported |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |