The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
RGS · Consumer Discretionary · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | TITN | RGS | PRTS | GRWG |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 26 | 27 (highest) | 27 (highest) | 26 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 53 (highest) | 40 | 22 | 10 |
| Pricing power | 28 | — | 52 (highest) | 42 |
| Returns on capital | 20 (highest) | 10 | 7 | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 0 | 28 | 28 | 55 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 30 (highest) | 29 | 24 | 24 |
| 24% below value if growth stopped today | 32% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | No price data | No price data | |
| Market cap | $554M | $66.7M | $597M | $94.3M |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2026 | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2025 |