The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
TKLS · Industrials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | TKLS | CLIR | WTER | RNGE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 33 (highest) | 33 (highest) | 33 (highest) | 33 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 60 | 65 (highest) | 60 | 35 |
| Pricing power | 0 | 21 | 33 (highest) | 24 |
| Returns on capital | — | 0 | 0 | 6 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 28 | 55 (highest) | 28 | 55 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 44 (highest) | 24 | 44 (highest) | 44 (highest) |
| No price data | No price data | No price data | 577% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $63.2M | $18.6M | $390210 | $77.5M |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2023 | FY2025 |