The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

TLN · Utilities · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

CMS · Utilities · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

AWX · Utilities · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

SPRU · Utilities · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

MeasureTLNCMSAWXSPRU
Moat Score (0–100)24 (highest)24 (highest)24 (highest)23
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend50485063 (highest)
Pricing power30 (highest)28
Returns on capital01 (highest)00
Balance-sheet safety0 (highest)0 (highest)0 (highest)0 (highest)
Capital allocation4445 (highest)3924
No price data105% above value if growth stopped todayNo price dataNo price data
Market cap$16.4B$22.9BNot reported$39.4M
Moat tierNo moatNo moatNo moatNo moat
Filing dateFY2025FY2025FY2025FY2025