The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
UPS · Industrials · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
PSIX · Industrials · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
| Measure | TNC | FLS | UPS | PSIX |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 57 | 58 (highest) | 57 | 56 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 40 | 95 (highest) | 25 | 85 |
| Pricing power | 69 (highest) | 51 | — | 2 |
| Returns on capital | 36 | 25 | 100 (highest) | 87 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 82 | 40 | 46 | 84 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 58 | 77 (highest) | 57 | 24 |
| 43% above value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 308% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | 136% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $1.6B | $9.2B | Not reported | $690M |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |