The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
CMLS · Communications · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
AMC · Communications · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | TOON | AD | CMLS | AMC |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 27 | 28 (highest) | 28 (highest) | 27 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 55 | 20 | 20 | 65 (highest) |
| Pricing power | 10 | 75 (highest) | — | — |
| Returns on capital | 0 (highest) | 0 (highest) | 0 (highest) | 0 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 28 (highest) | 28 (highest) | 28 (highest) | 0 |
| Capital allocation | 44 | 17 | 64 (highest) | 44 |
| No price data | 347% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | No price data | |
| Market cap | $31.8M | $3.0B | $87200 | $1.4B |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |