The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
LIQT · Industrials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The businessTrend component abstained: Fewer than two aligned fiscal years of revenue and diluted EPS are available; the filing history does not contain a measurable trend. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | TPC | UVV | SKYX | LIQT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 25 (highest) | 25 (highest) | 25 (highest) | 25 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 51 | 57 | 63 (highest) | — |
| Pricing power | 0 | 33 (highest) | 12 | 0 |
| Returns on capital | 7 | 11 (highest) | 0 | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 61 (highest) | 4 | 28 | 55 |
| Capital allocation | 5 | 23 | 24 | 44 (highest) |
| No price data | 27% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | No price data | |
| Market cap | $4.6B | $1.3B | $135M | $6.3M |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2025 |