The Moat Index

Compare moats, side by side.

Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.

Try AAPL vs MSFT vs KO, V vs MA, or COST vs WMT vs TGT.

TROX · Materials · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

ACDC · Materials · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

RYAM · Materials · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

WTTR · Materials · No moat

No moat

Doesn't clear the bar

The businessTrend component abstained: Fewer than two aligned fiscal years of revenue and diluted EPS are available; the filing history does not contain a measurable trend. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.

MeasureTROXACDCRYAMWTTR
Moat Score (0–100)1012 (highest)12 (highest)5
Methodology versionmoat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0moat-index@3.0.0
Business trend20732 (highest)
Pricing power830 (highest)00
Returns on capital004 (highest)0
Balance-sheet safety0 (highest)0 (highest)0 (highest)0 (highest)
Capital allocation24 (highest)24 (highest)24 (highest)20
No price data536% above value if growth stopped todayNo price dataNo price data
Market cap$989M$771M$562MNot reported
Moat tierNo moatNo moatNo moatNo moat
Filing dateFY2025FY2025FY2025FY2025