The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
TSCO · Consumer Discretionary · Wide moat
Wonderful & reasonably priced
BBW · Consumer Discretionary · Wide moat
Wonderful & reasonably priced
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | TSCO | BBW | WING | FIVE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 85 | 86 (highest) | 86 (highest) | 85 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 79 | 89 | 100 (highest) | 84 |
| Pricing power | 61 | 77 | 99 (highest) | 62 |
| Returns on capital | 100 (highest) | — | 100 (highest) | 100 (highest) |
| Balance-sheet safety | 89 | 78 | 40 | 100 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 96 | 100 (highest) | 88 | 79 |
| 39% above value if growth stopped today | 46% below value if growth stopped today (largest discount to value if growth stopped today) | 268% above value if growth stopped today | 317% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | $17.0B | $313M | $2.9B | $12.9B |
| Moat tier | Wide moat | Wide moat | Wide moat | Wide moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2026 | FY2025 | FY2026 |