The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
BSIN · Materials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
CRK · Materials · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The pricingPower component abstained: Not enough years of gross-margin data to score pricing power. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | TSEOQ | BSIN | TOMZ | CRK |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 34 (highest) | 34 (highest) | 34 (highest) | 33 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 15 | 35 | 20 | 54 (highest) |
| Pricing power | 0 | — | 93 (highest) | — |
| Returns on capital | 88 (highest) | 0 | 4 | 8 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 0 | 55 (highest) | 28 | 27 |
| Capital allocation | 64 (highest) | 44 | 24 | 44 |
| No price data | No price data | No price data | 69% above value if growth stopped today | |
| Market cap | Not reported | $44M | $31.2M | $4.0B |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |