The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
CPNG · Consumer Discretionary · Shallow moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The returnsOnCapital component abstained: Not enough years of ROIC data to score returns on capital. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | TSLA | CTM | ESCA | CPNG |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 46 (highest) | 46 (highest) | 46 (highest) | 46 (highest) |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 60 | 65 | 25 | 80 (highest) |
| Pricing power | 22 | 66 (highest) | 34 | 16 |
| Returns on capital | 21 | 0 | 22 (highest) | — |
| Balance-sheet safety | 82 | 55 | 96 (highest) | 64 |
| Capital discipline | 44 | 44 | 52 (highest) | 24 |
| Price vs. high estimate | 820% above high estimate | No price data | 35% above high estimate (largest discount to high estimate) | 1580% above high estimate |
| Market cap | $1.17T | $59.1M | $255M | $28.8B |
| Moat tier | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat | Shallow moat |
| Filings as of | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |