The Moat Index
Compare moats, side by side.
Two to four companies, scored on the same five investor questions from their SEC filings — so the comparison is apples to apples. The method is fully public.
BRID · Consumer Staples · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The businessTrend component abstained: Fewer than two aligned fiscal years of revenue and diluted EPS are available; the filing history does not contain a measurable trend. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
YHC · Consumer Staples · No moat
Doesn't clear the bar
The capitalDiscipline component abstained: Not enough owner-earnings history to score capital discipline. The other four 20% weights were renormalized over the scored 80%.
| Measure | TSN | BRID | BOF | YHC |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moat Score (0–100) | 26 | 27 (highest) | 27 (highest) | 26 |
| Methodology version | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 | moat-index@3.0.0 |
| Business trend | 47 | — | 63 (highest) | 50 |
| Pricing power | 0 | 31 (highest) | 0 | 0 |
| Returns on capital | 34 (highest) | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| Balance-sheet safety | 13 | 28 | 28 | 55 (highest) |
| Capital allocation | 37 | 44 (highest) | 44 (highest) | — |
| 64% above value if growth stopped today | No price data | No price data | No price data | |
| Market cap | $19.3B | $52.2M | $29.4M | $40.8M |
| Moat tier | No moat | No moat | No moat | No moat |
| Filing date | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 | FY2025 |